Captains of Industry, Take Note
Posted in Miscellaneous on April 9th, 2007 by JennyThis post is for you captains of industry, boards that hire them, fund managers who bet on them and the average Joe (or Jane) who invests in the companies they run. A little knowledge never hurt anyone.
It seems bigger isn’t always better, especially for companies and stockholders, when it comes to the desires of their leaders. I ran across a great post from It is a Numeric Life citing an interesting study released in 2007 which located the primary residences of 488 CEOs of S&P 500 Companies and demonstrated a link between CEO home purchases and the stock performance of the company’s they ran. Click here to read the post.
This study, authored by two finance professors, found the average S&P 500 CEO home was more than 6,000 square feet, had 12 rooms, over 5 acres of land and a market value of $3.1 million. The analysis found:
- CEOs who lived in houses larger than the average of their S&P 500 peers had stocks that returned 3.35%* less than the stocks of companies whose CEOs lived in below-average sized homes; and
- CEOs who lived in the biggest homes of the group surveyed had stocks that underperformed their rivals in homes identified as being average or below average for this group by 6.9%*.
The study also examines the stock performance for 164 companies who had CEOs that purchased new homes after coming on board. When the CEOs bought the super large homes (10,000 square feet with 10 or more acres) their company’s stock performance suffered – to the tune of 1.25% performance lag each month.
Make of this what you will – use it for hiring advice, investment advice or as just plain old sage advice…
Click here to read the entire report yourself.
*on average





