<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Than Skin Deep</title>
	<link>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/</link>
	<description>a tongue-in-cheek quest for understanding...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: What is Attractive?</title>
		<link>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>What is Attractive?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>[...] Posts: More Than Skin Deep Dealing With the Hand You Were Dealt    Share this article with others: These icons link to social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Posts: More Than Skin Deep Dealing With the Hand You Were Dealt    Share this article with others: These icons link to social [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 22:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Dale and Erin,
It's easy to get lost in, huh?  

Dale, 
Thanks for reading! (and commenting).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dale and Erin,<br />
It&#8217;s easy to get lost in, huh?  </p>
<p>Dale,<br />
Thanks for reading! (and commenting).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 12:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Dale, that's an excellent point. Imagine if we could increase our lens and view the entire solar system. Would we even recognize it? Would we miss the beauty we can see from our current vantage point? Would the new view give us a better perspective? We seem to be very stuck viewing the beauty of things we understand or things that look how we always perceive them to look.  This leads me to wonder what other beauties we are missing everyday because we don't know where to look, don't know how or fail to look all together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dale, that&#8217;s an excellent point. Imagine if we could increase our lens and view the entire solar system. Would we even recognize it? Would we miss the beauty we can see from our current vantage point? Would the new view give us a better perspective? We seem to be very stuck viewing the beauty of things we understand or things that look how we always perceive them to look.  This leads me to wonder what other beauties we are missing everyday because we don&#8217;t know where to look, don&#8217;t know how or fail to look all together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 03:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article, I'm intrigued with some of the electron microcopic images.  The incredible definition, just leads one to think about how complex our world is and how little we know about our surrondings.  I often wonder if our world (earth) when condidering it is part of a much larger universe is similiar to one diatom shown by the electron microcope. If were on the diatom looking out could we comprehend what we would see?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article, I&#8217;m intrigued with some of the electron microcopic images.  The incredible definition, just leads one to think about how complex our world is and how little we know about our surrondings.  I often wonder if our world (earth) when condidering it is part of a much larger universe is similiar to one diatom shown by the electron microcope. If were on the diatom looking out could we comprehend what we would see?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 17:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>You find really cool articles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You find really cool articles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 02:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>PS: I'm still learning some things too. It's fun :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: I&#8217;m still learning some things too. It&#8217;s fun <img src='http://jenny-and-erin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 02:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Here's something similar: http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn11775</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s something similar: <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn11775" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn11775</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>What a fitting quote, thanks Mark.  

PS.  If you happen to check back we are trying to get the RSS Comment feed figured out, we're learning as we go...  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fitting quote, thanks Mark.  </p>
<p>PS.  If you happen to check back we are trying to get the RSS Comment feed figured out, we&#8217;re learning as we go&#8230;  <img src='http://jenny-and-erin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beauty and love &#124; The Winding Path</title>
		<link>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Beauty and love &#124; The Winding Path</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 05:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>[...] We perceive beauty in many ways, and in many things. The most common is seeing the beauty in another person whom we love. We might also consider a particular piece of music beautiful, or the smell of a flower garden in full bloom, or the feel of silk against our skin, or the complex and interesting flavours of an unusual dish. As mentioned in my previous post on the topic, our perception affect what we consider beautiful, and it&#8217;s every one of our senses that contribute to our perception. And as Jenny just pointed out, even when our naked senses aren&#8217;t enough we can enhance them to perceive an even deeper level of beauty than we previously thought existed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] We perceive beauty in many ways, and in many things. The most common is seeing the beauty in another person whom we love. We might also consider a particular piece of music beautiful, or the smell of a flower garden in full bloom, or the feel of silk against our skin, or the complex and interesting flavours of an unusual dish. As mentioned in my previous post on the topic, our perception affect what we consider beautiful, and it&#8217;s every one of our senses that contribute to our perception. And as Jenny just pointed out, even when our naked senses aren&#8217;t enough we can enhance them to perceive an even deeper level of beauty than we previously thought existed. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 04:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jenny-and-erin.com/2007/05/more-than-skin-deep/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of a quote from Richard Feynman:

A poet once said "The whole universe is in a glass of wine." We will probably never know in what sense he meant that, for poets do not write to be understood. But it is true that if we look at a glass closely enough we see the entire universe. There are the things of physics: the twisting liquid which evaporates depending on the wind and weather, the reflections in the glass, and our imaginations adds the atoms. The glass is a distillation of the Earth's rocks, and in its composition we see the secret of the universe's age, and the evolution of the stars. What strange array of chemicals are there in the wine? How did they come to be? There are the ferments, the enzymes, the substrates, and the products. There in wine is found the great generalization: all life is fermentation. Nobody can discover the chemistry of wine without discovering, as did Louis Pasteur, the cause of much disease. How vivid is the claret, pressing its existence into the consciousness that watches it! If our small minds, for some convenience, divide this glass of wine, this universe, into parts — physics, biology, geology, astronomy, psychology, and so on — remember that Nature does not know it! So let us put it all back together, not forgetting ultimately what it is for. Let it give us one more final pleasure: drink it and forget it all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of a quote from Richard Feynman:</p>
<p>A poet once said &#8220;The whole universe is in a glass of wine.&#8221; We will probably never know in what sense he meant that, for poets do not write to be understood. But it is true that if we look at a glass closely enough we see the entire universe. There are the things of physics: the twisting liquid which evaporates depending on the wind and weather, the reflections in the glass, and our imaginations adds the atoms. The glass is a distillation of the Earth&#8217;s rocks, and in its composition we see the secret of the universe&#8217;s age, and the evolution of the stars. What strange array of chemicals are there in the wine? How did they come to be? There are the ferments, the enzymes, the substrates, and the products. There in wine is found the great generalization: all life is fermentation. Nobody can discover the chemistry of wine without discovering, as did Louis Pasteur, the cause of much disease. How vivid is the claret, pressing its existence into the consciousness that watches it! If our small minds, for some convenience, divide this glass of wine, this universe, into parts — physics, biology, geology, astronomy, psychology, and so on — remember that Nature does not know it! So let us put it all back together, not forgetting ultimately what it is for. Let it give us one more final pleasure: drink it and forget it all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.378 seconds -->
